Search for: "UKSC Blog" Results 261 - 280 of 681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
legalweek There’s an interesting side-swipe at media lawyers from Lord Walker quoted on the UKSC blog in discussing privacy injunctions. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
  Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 10:00 am by CMS
The UKSC Blog has partnered with the HRLA and, as an additional prize, the winning essay will be published on the UKSC Blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
In the long-running case of Sugar (Deceased) v British Broadcasting Corporation [2012] UKSC 4, the Supreme Court had to determine to what extent the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”) applies to information held by the BBC for journalistic purposes. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:52 am by steve cornforth blog
*Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5Miller v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41 [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  Its application is one of a number of instances we have discussed in this blog concerning the limits of freedom of contract in the face of overarching public policy constraints (also see the same struggle in the state law context). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
‘A lot’, the press would answer” – these were the memorable words of Lord Rodger in the Supreme Court in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 [63]. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The Internet cases blog has a post on the case of Brittain v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am by Martin Downs
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30 – Read judgment  On 4 October 2007 the parents of a 15 year old boy complained that he had been kissed by his 22 year old school sessional music teaching assistant (G). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:05 am by Poloko Hiri - competition winner
This blog post is the winning entry in a competition run by Matrix Chambers and GSM London. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. 15:58: Mr Harris QC suggests this is an appropriate place to finish for the day and the Justices agree. 15:54: Citing the Canadian Supreme Court case of Godfrey, Mr Harris QC says the court referred there to Microsoft. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:06 am by CMS
In the meantime, and while we await judgment, we would commend to readers the Blog posts from Isabel Williams, hononary artist in residence to the UKSC Blog, who has sketched some of the highlights from the hearings last week here. [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Supreme Court decided to uphold the lawfulness of the Act (see the UKSC Blog’s summary of the decision). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:14 am by J
As our friends at the UKSC blog previously noted, it would be helpful if the Supreme Court would publish such information itself so that everyone would know of such decisions, rather than waiting for the information to trickle out. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:14 am by J
As our friends at the UKSC blog previously noted, it would be helpful if the Supreme Court would publish such information itself so that everyone would know of such decisions, rather than waiting for the information to trickle out. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 – Read judgment  (On appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 698  and [2009] EWHC 1827 ) At first sight, Article 2 – the ‘right to life’ – seems to be a prohibition on extra-judicial executions and state-sponsored death squads. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Appellate History Further detail regarding the decisions of the High Court and the Court of Appeal are set out in the Case Preview on this blog, but briefly they are as follows: At first instance, the High Court allowed Mrs Braganza’s contractual claim on the basis that BP had not been reasonable when forming the opinion that it did. [read post]