Search for: "UKSC Blog" Results 281 - 300 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:14 am by J
As our friends at the UKSC blog previously noted, it would be helpful if the Supreme Court would publish such information itself so that everyone would know of such decisions, rather than waiting for the information to trickle out. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:14 am by J
As our friends at the UKSC blog previously noted, it would be helpful if the Supreme Court would publish such information itself so that everyone would know of such decisions, rather than waiting for the information to trickle out. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Supreme Court decided to uphold the lawfulness of the Act (see the UKSC Blog’s summary of the decision). [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. 15:58: Mr Harris QC suggests this is an appropriate place to finish for the day and the Justices agree. 15:54: Citing the Canadian Supreme Court case of Godfrey, Mr Harris QC says the court referred there to Microsoft. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 5:41 am by Admin
The decision of the majority of the panel of seven Supreme Court justices in Cavendish Square Holdings BV v El Makdessi; ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 is expected to have significant impact on both the study and practice of contract law, as well as on the syllabus for the MCT assessment. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Appellate History Further detail regarding the decisions of the High Court and the Court of Appeal are set out in the Case Preview on this blog, but briefly they are as follows: At first instance, the High Court allowed Mrs Braganza’s contractual claim on the basis that BP had not been reasonable when forming the opinion that it did. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:38 am by RUTH SMITH, MILLS & REEVE
Although the parties had already agreed a compromised settlement (see this earlier blog), they asked that the Supreme Court still hear the appeal, as there were important points of principle at stake. [read post]
 Jill Mason and Samuel Lindsay both contribute regularly to the Mills & Reeve Health Team Blog, which provides helpful client-focussed updates on legal matters affecting the health and care sector. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 – Read judgment  (On appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 698  and [2009] EWHC 1827 ) At first sight, Article 2 – the ‘right to life’ – seems to be a prohibition on extra-judicial executions and state-sponsored death squads. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:49 am by Anita Davies
The UKSC blog was delighted to learn that Calders and Grandidge hold the royal warrant for preserved timber fencing and Corgi Hosiery is the proud supplier of royal socks. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Marilyn Stowe
This piece was originally posted on the Marilyn Stowe Blog and is reposted here with thanks. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am by INFORRM
In the case of Kennedy v Chairty Commission ([2014] UKSC 20), in judgments running to 90 pages, the Supreme Court dismissed this appeal by Mr Kennedy, a Times journalist, for access to documents generated by the Charity Commission under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
  Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Toby Lovett, Olswang LLP
Factual background A detailed background of this case can be found in this blog’s Case Preview, but very briefly, it concerned a request by Guardian journalist Rob Evans, who in April 2005 sought disclosure of a series of written communications between HRH the Prince of Wales and various governmental departments under the FOIA and EIR. [read post]
Counsel for the respondent (and this blog), had urged the Courts to formulate a principled and consistent test for assessing the rationality of placing a country on the “white list”. [read post]