Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 481 - 500
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
Case Preview: Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust, Kirsten Sjvoll, UKSC blog. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:15 am
Please see the UKSC Blog case preview here. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
2010 and 2011 have seen the development of three key issues relating to the (political) role of the judiciary – the concept and place of human rights within our legal system, the appointment of judges and, more recently, the role and influence of the UKSC in Scotland. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
See also the Pink Tape blog’s post on the topic. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
It made clear that there is nothing in Fairchild or the recent Supreme Court decision in Sienkiewicz v Greif [2011] UKSC 10 (please see our blog on this decision here) altering the test for whether there had been a breach of duty. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
See: New evidence in Points Based System appeals, Free Movement Blog. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:08 am
The Supreme Court has published its decision in the case of AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and Others [2011] UKSC 46 in which AXA and other insurers (the Insurers) appealed against the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session regarding the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-Related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the 2009 Act) (please see our previous blog here for further information on that decision).The 2009 Act was passed to reverse the… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
The Inforrm’s blog posted this piece about the highlights of the speech. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
This post was orginally posted on the UKHR blog and is reposted here with permission and thanks. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
This post was orginally posted on the UKHR blog and is reposted here with permission and thanks. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
The Supreme Court decided to uphold the lawfulness of the Act (see the UKSC Blog’s summary of the decision). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:15 am
This post was originally published on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog and is reposted here with thanks. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:15 am
This post was originally published on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog and is reposted here with thanks. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
The episode came to be known as “Catgate”/”Catflap”* and was widely covered both in the mainstream press and the legal blogs; our blog in particular posted four articles. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
This post first appeared on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog On 25 May, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24, which held that Fraser, who had been convicted of murdering his wife, had received an unfair trial contrary to Article 6 ECHR, because of the Crown’s failure to disclose evidence to the defence. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
This post first appeared on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog On 25 May, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24, which held that Fraser, who had been convicted of murdering his wife, had received an unfair trial contrary to Article 6 ECHR, because of the Crown’s failure to disclose evidence to the defence. [read post]
