Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 561 - 580
of 691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
Other roundups in the blawgosphere Do not miss the excellent news roundups in Law Think’s “latest human rights developments in the UK” and the UKSC Blog’s “The week that was”. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
This post is a guest blog post written by Sarah Phillimore. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Its application is one of a number of instances we have discussed in this blog concerning the limits of freedom of contract in the face of overarching public policy constraints (also see the same struggle in the state law context). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:32 am
On 30th September, the UKSC will host a mock ‘Ecocide’ trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am
Other roundups: The Week That Was by UKSC blog offers a wide-ranging roundup of news, finishing with the bemusing story of the security personnel sacked for tagging an offender’s false leg. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
A commercially sensible transaction which is entered into in good faith should not be unwound because of the anti-deprivation rule (see paragraphs 78 to 79 of the UKSC’s judgment). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
Other legal news roundups: The UKSC blog provides an overview of the riots, paying particular attention to responses from politicians; The Week that Was – The Mask of Anarchy. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
The UK Supreme Court Blog posted commentaries on the cases of AB v Ministry of Defence and R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
Comments on the judgement can be found in UKSC Blog, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, Indian Corporate Law Blog and Lex Arbitri Blog. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
The UKSC blog’s suggestions for new robes is illustrated opposite . . . [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
Listen to the podcast Useful links Joshua Rozenberg: Who will be the two new supreme court judges? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as amended by the… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:44 am
The essay below was written in response to a competition run by the Big Voice Project with the support of the UKSC Blog. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:10 am
However, as Giles Peaker from the Nearly Legal Blog points out, the traveller and Gypsy communities will be those hardest hit by the new measures as some 25% of the Gypsy and Traveller population who live in caravans do not live on authorised sites. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
Case Comment: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; R (MR (Pakistan)) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (IAC) [2011] UKSC 28 « UKSC blog Family Lore: MK v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30 – Read judgment On 4 October 2007 the parents of a 15 year old boy complained that he had been kissed by his 22 year old school sessional music teaching assistant (G). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
Also, responding to Lady Hale’s speech to The Law Society on legal aid cuts, the UKSC blog remarks that the Supreme Court Justice took an “unusual” step by implicitly endorsing criticisms levelled at the government’s justice policy, leaving her vulnerable to a potential application for recusal should legal proceedings on the policy ever reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
