Search for: "UKSC Blog" Results 561 - 580 of 702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Supreme Court decided to uphold the lawfulness of the Act (see the UKSC Blog’s summary of the decision). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege.   [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
The episode came to be known as “Catgate”/”Catflap”* and was widely covered both in the mainstream press and the legal blogs; our blog in particular posted four articles. [read post]
This post first appeared on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog On 25 May, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24, which held that Fraser, who had been convicted of murdering his wife, had received an unfair trial contrary to Article 6 ECHR, because of the Crown’s failure to disclose evidence to the defence. [read post]
This post first appeared on the UK Constitutional Law Group Blog On 25 May, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24, which held that Fraser, who had been convicted of murdering his wife, had received an unfair trial contrary to Article 6 ECHR, because of the Crown’s failure to disclose evidence to the defence.  [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am by Adam Wagner
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Other roundups in the blawgosphere Do not miss the excellent news roundups in Law Think’s “latest human rights developments in the UK” and the UKSC Blog’s “The week that was”. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by familoo
This post is a guest blog post written by Sarah Phillimore. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  Its application is one of a number of instances we have discussed in this blog concerning the limits of freedom of contract in the face of overarching public policy constraints (also see the same struggle in the state law context). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:32 am by Blog Editorial
On 30th September, the UKSC will host a  mock ‘Ecocide’ trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am by Graeme Hall
Other roundups: The Week That Was by UKSC blog offers a wide-ranging roundup of news, finishing with the bemusing story of the security personnel sacked for tagging an offender’s false leg. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  A commercially sensible transaction which is entered into in good faith should not be unwound because of the anti-deprivation rule (see paragraphs 78 to 79 of the UKSC’s judgment). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
Other legal news roundups: The UKSC blog provides an overview of the riots, paying particular attention to responses from politicians; The Week that Was – The Mask of Anarchy. [read post]