Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 621 - 640
of 679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
These types of case will generally be fact-specific, requiring a careful balancing of competing rights; the Court of Appeal’s decision is certainly not a death knell for “fly on the wall” documentaries, like PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd (Rev 1) [2016] UKSC 26 was for the “kiss and tell” tabloid stories. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm
Arguments relating to the concept of public domain and, in particular, analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in PJS v News Group Newspapers [2016] UKSC 26, and privacy law generally, have been expertly dealt with in two previous Inforrm posts from the Brett Wilson Media Law Blog and Rebecca Moosavian. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
The challenge in T The previous system for this was successfully challenged in T [2014] UKSC 35 and it is necessary to look at this before we see the battle lines in the present case. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Hence, in Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012) [46] Lord Kerr (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed concurring) held: The particular circumstances affecting the individual whose personal data would be revealed on foot of a Norwich Pharmacal Order will always call for close consideration and these may, in some limited instances, displace the interests of the applicant for the disclosure of the… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:53 am
We summarise some of the key group litigation areas below: Opt-out claims: The 2021 Supreme Court decision in Lloyd v Google UKSC 2019/0213 applied a more restrictive interpretation of the “opt out” representative action regime set out in CPR 6 than had been applied by the Courts previously. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 3:44 pm
And then I shall cross my fingers and hope no-one notices…This is what they call active blog management. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:26 am
will reveal all – and, fortunately, there is an excellent website where this objective and useful analysis is being done: UKSC | Blog The rest of The Times story is devoted, of course, to the rather shoddy way Jonathan Sumption QC was treated by the ‘powers that be’. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
We wrote an Inforrm blog post on the first judgment here. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
Max Mosley has been unsuccessful in his long running campaign to compel the English press to give advance notice of threatened invasions of privacy. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
” Mischon de Reya analysed the decision in a blog post. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Panopticon Blog has a piece “Reforming UK data protection laws – the ICO responds” by Anya Proops QC. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Hunton Andrews Kurth blog has more information. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
The same publication also had a piece about the recent decision in McNally v Saunders, “Retired solicitor sees off harassment claim over ‘puerile’ blog”. [read post]
