Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 641 - 660
of 679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
The ICO Blog had a post “Improving mobile phone data extraction practices across the criminal justice system in the UK”. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Hunton Andrews Kurth Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “Swiss Game Developer Settles FTC Allegations Over COPPA Safe Harbor Claims”. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013] IESC 14 (13… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm
The term ‘super injunction’ has been used incorrectly by the media, often to describe anonymised injunctions (PJS v News Group Newspapers Limited [2016] UKSC 26). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 4:54 pm
This position was set out a recent case before the Supreme Court (ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5). [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
The ICO had a blog post “ICO creates practical design guidance to help embed children’s privacy standards”. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
” Proportionality The classic three step proportionality test – was the objective important enough to justify limiting a right, was the measure connected to that objective, and was the measure no more intrusive than other necessary – has been elaborated over the past decade, most recently by Lord Sumption in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2013] 3 WLR 170, [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
The ICO had a blog post regarding upcoming updates to guidance and the development of a new code of practice in line with the statutory requirement under section 124 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
In Re Northern Ireland’s Human Rights Commission’s application for judicial review [2018] UKSC 27, [2019] 1 All ER 173 at [6] Lady Hale observed that for those women who become pregnant, or who are obliged to carry a pregnancy to term, against their will, there can be few greater invasions of their autonomy and bodily integrity. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
The ICO had a blog post “Information Commissioner’s Opinion addresses privacy concerns on the use of live facial recognition technology in public places”. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
On 5 May 2020 Professor Neil Ferguson, the epidemiologist who advised on the UK coronavirus lockdown, quit as a government adviser after the Daily Telegraph exposed him flouting the rules by receiving visits from his lover at his home. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
So it is comfortingly familiar to legal readers, and many of it’s stories will have been heard and told by readers of this blog. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Further, in R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 Lord Hope held: “Excluding a person from employment in her chosen field is liable to affect her ability to develop relationships with others, and the problems that this creates as regards the possibility of earning a living can have serious repercussions on the enjoyment of private life… She is entitled also to have her good name and reputation protected. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
Of the cases listed in the second extract, Lachaux was appealed and reached the UK Supreme Court last summer: [2019] 3 WLR 18, [2019] UKSC 27 (12 June 2019). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
