Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 141 - 160
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Thirteen years after the House of Lords had firmly shut the door on any notion of a doctrine extending the scope of patent protection outside the claims, the UK Supreme Court in yesterday’s judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48 reversed gear and reintroduced a true form of doctrine of equivalents into UK law. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Thirteen years after the House of Lords had firmly shut the door on any notion of a doctrine extending the scope of patent protection outside the claims, the UK Supreme Court in yesterday’s judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48 reversed gear and reintroduced a true form of doctrine of equivalents into UK law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Hence, in Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012) [46] Lord Kerr (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed concurring) held: The particular circumstances affecting the individual whose personal data would be revealed on foot of a Norwich Pharmacal Order will always call for close consideration and these may, in some limited instances, displace the interests of the applicant for the disclosure of the… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:39 am
The UKSC blog writes with great sadness of the death of Lord Toulson on the evening of Tuesday 27 June 2017. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
The challenge in T The previous system for this was successfully challenged in T [2014] UKSC 35 and it is necessary to look at this before we see the battle lines in the present case. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm
This has led the RPC blog to characterise CFAs and ATE premiums as being “out of the running” in freedom of expression cases, and to predict that the continued recoverability of additional liabilities will be short lived. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court is now in recess until 24 April 2017. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
This post originally appeared on the RPC Data & Privacy Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:12 am
This article was originally published on the UKCLA Blog here. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 2:27 am
Blog to follow The Telegraph with Judge rules boy must be taught in Islamic school despite complaints from ‘Anglo-Saxon’ father. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:45 pm
| Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding" | IP Summit 2016 (Second Part) | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:30 am
Full report: Bailii.Ilott v The Blue Cross & Ors [2017] UKSC 17 (15 March 2017)Appeal against decision of Court of Appeal setting aside earlier award on Inheritance Act claim, and re-evaluating the award. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
For a discussion on the decision of the Court of Appeal, see George Thomas’ case comments here on the police blog. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
Jack Ballantyne, of the UKSC Blog team, sat down with him to find out more about the unique opportunity for aspiring young lawyers. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
The ubiquity of social media platforms and their significance in disseminating information (true or false) to potentially wide groups of people was highly unlikely to have been in the minds of the European legislators when they agreed, in 2000, the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) (ECD). [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:09 am
Originally posted on Inforrm’s Blog here. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
And, in the application of Jameel, the UK Supreme Court in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] 2 AC 273, [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012) provided significant latitude to editorial judgment. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
So it is comfortingly familiar to legal readers, and many of it’s stories will have been heard and told by readers of this blog. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:07 am
The Supreme Court is now in recess until 11 January 2017. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Further, in R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 Lord Hope held: “Excluding a person from employment in her chosen field is liable to affect her ability to develop relationships with others, and the problems that this creates as regards the possibility of earning a living can have serious repercussions on the enjoyment of private life… She is entitled also to have her good name and reputation protected. [read post]
