Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 1 - 20 of 6,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there… [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:07 am by tracey
United States of America v Nolan [2014] EWCA Civ 71;  [2014] WLR (D)  46 ‘Employers who were public administrative bodies or sovereign states were not exempt from the obligation to consult employees’ representatives about proposed collective redundancies imposed by section 188(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, as substituted. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) Supreme Court “Only the gravest effects of interference with family life would make extradition disproportionate to the public interest in the prevention of crime.” [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:28 am
 Edwards v Government of the United States of America [2007] EWHC 1877 (Admin) “In deciding whether there was dual criminality under the Extradition Act 2003, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:13 am
Additional facts inadmissible in extradition Edwards v Government of United States of America “In deciding whether there was dual criminality in extradition, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:17 am by sally
Government of the United States of America v Giese [2015] EWHC 3658 (Admin); [2015] WLR (D) 550 ‘An issue raised on appeal “that was not raised at the extradition hearing” referred to a new issue that was raised in argument on appeal as a ground for allowing the appeal and which was not the subject of concluded argument below for the purposes of meeting the condition for allowing an appeal set out in section 106(5)(a) of the Extradition Act… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Government of the United States of America Privy Council “The principle of stare decisis was not absolute and the Privy Council could exercise its power to depart from precedent if it concluded that one of its own previous decisions was incorrect. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am by sally
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made.” [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by sally
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served.” [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:44 pm by Lawrence Solum
Charles (Government of the United States of America - Air Force) has posted Weighing the Constitutionality of State Immigration Verification Laws in the Wake of Arizona V. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Doc. 25 – Motion for Leave to File Statement of Interest of the United States of America – Filed 4-1-2016  Doc. 25-1 – Statement of Interest of the United States of America – Filed 4-1-2016  Complaint and motion to dismiss here and here. [read post]