Search for: "UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. U.S." Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (where the defendant wasn’t very “international”), and World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm by dbmadmin
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that federal antitrust defendants generally may not assert a pass-on defense, because even a direct purchaser who passes on an overcharge, will likely be damaged in other ways by defendants’ violation of antitrust law. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Dubilier Condenser Corp., 289 U.S. 178, 199 (1933). [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
  The court distinguished Hanover Shoe in its discussion of Midwestern Machinery Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of  a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of  a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]