Search for: "UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
I have taken an initial look at the United States Department of Justice's complaint filed in federal court against the National Association of Realtors (Case No. 05 C 5140). [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
So this transcontinental legal dispute continues, in New York (applying Illinois law) and California (where it has now been remanded to state court). [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:57 pm
Tennessee Department of Revenue, Hunter v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
Sources: Management Science Associates Inc., state revenue departments, author calculations. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) to provide funding support for state and local law enforcement, the U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; 638 Contract) United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
Generally, these local sales taxes are levied on the same base used at the state level, and collections and administration are centralized within the state’s revenue agency, with the local share remitted to the municipality by the state collection authority. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Their argument cited ongoing litigation in Mondelez International, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
