Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FRANCE" Results 101 - 120 of 1,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
It is time for the United States to do just that - to grant the Uighurs asylum within U.S. borders. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm by Ruth Levush
According to Nicole, France does not have class actions similar to the type used in the United States or in Israel. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:57 am
The complaint recites that the luxury goods manufacturer began selling its luggage in France in 1854 and in the United States in 1893. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
As noted in my preview last week, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is the Supreme Court’s first arbitration case of the 2019 term. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:59 am
The specific question, as phrased by the Court, was: Are foreign subsidiaries of a United States parent corporation amenable to suit in state court on claims unrelated to any activity of the subsidiaries in the forum State? [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:15 pm by Unknown
Big Man (Tribal Courts; Tribal Codes; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:45 am
Extremely interesting case from the 11th Circuit today, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am by Ronald Mann
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is a bit different from the typical Supreme Court arbitration case. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Ronald Mann
The treaty obligates the United States and about 160 other signatories to enforce arbitration agreements between businesses of member states. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom, at paras. 135-140, as a procedural immunity, in an error acknowledged by the Court in Z and Others v. [read post]