Search for: "UNITED STATES v. JACOBS" Results 61 - 80 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:52 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Stephen Heifetz evaluated the burden of enhancing export controls and screening foreign investments in the United States on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the entity that would be responsible for enforcing such directives. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Nicolas P. Terry
Since 1973 there have been nearly 2,000 prosecutions of women in the United States for reproductive conduct. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:58 am by INFORRM
While the term is now well known – coined by two American academics in the late 1980s – only the United States (in some 33 states), the three largest provinces in Canada (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec), and the Australian Central Territory are lauded for having anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]