Search for: "UPS Ground Freight, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2017, 6:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Chairman Miscimarra dissented, taking issue with the election rule itself and its procedural shortcuts that could, he said, result in a denial of due process (UPS Ground Freight, Inc., July 27, 2017). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am by MBettman
Freight Handlers, Inc., 2012-Ohio-880 (Statutory requirements that a party appealing from an Industrial Commission order name the administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation as a party to the appeal and serve the administrator with the notice of appeal are not jurisdictional requirements.) [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:32 am by MBettman
Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 2004-Ohio-2365 (1993 version of R.C. 4123.931 held unconstitutional on equal protection grounds, as statutory subrogation did not reach settlement agreements.) [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Inc., ARB No. 13-074, ALJ No. 2005-ERA-006, slip op. at 12 (ARB Apr. 25, 2014), but that the ALJ had analyzed the case using MSPB authority that used analysis like that in Speegle. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
The case involves a company called MSN Air Services, Inc. founded in 2005 to provide air cargo/freight shipping services at JFK International Airport. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm by Nietzer
In 2008, Con-way Inc., a global freight forwarder, paid a $300,000 penalty for making hundreds of relatively small payments to Customs Officials in the Philippines. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Circuit case (opinion by Justice Janice Rogers Brown) striking down a delegation of regulatory authority to Amtrak on private non-delegation doctrine grounds. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm by Miriam Seifter
Hayes Freight Lines, Inc., on the Port’s ability to deny access to carriers for violations of any concession agreement requirements that are not preempted. [read post]