Search for: "US Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, No. 07-1355 (4th Cir. 2009) by Robert J. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:00 am
The Journal writes that EPA has been planning for several years to exercise its authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) even before a permit has been filed with the US Amy Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers). [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:26 am
The first is whether the Act gives authority to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, or instead to U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
Army Corps Engineers, 2014 U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
” Meanwhile, under Section 404 of the Act, the Army Corps of Engineers retains authority to regulate the “discharge of dredged or fill material” into waterways or wetlands. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:27 pm
The Supreme Court's decision reversed the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal's determination that the issuance of a permit for the slurry discharges by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) under Section 404 of the CWA violated the new source performance standard set forth in Section 306 of the CWA. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Army Corps of Engineers; they can serve a useful public purpose by assisting with the restoration and preservation of waterways subject to the CWA. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (Oil Pipeline – Environmental Impacts)United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm
U.S Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline - EasementsMoody v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm
U.S Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline - EasementsMoody v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:18 am
Army Corp of Engineers. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:57 am
Army Corps of Engineers regarding proposed rules that would dramatically expand their regulatory authority over all waters in any way connected to navigable waters. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:47 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (Oil Pipeline - Environmental Impacts)United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 07-35506 addressed alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”). [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 07-35506 addressed alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”). [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:53 am
Army Corps of Engineers, is GRANTED. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
It is well settled that the Army Corps of Engineers, the Coast Guard, and even the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 07-35506 addressed alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”). [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
Army Corps of Engineers, et al, without comment letting stand the 6th Circuit decision HMC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
The issue is whether the Army Corps of Engineers has the authority to issue permits for dumping dredge or fill dirt into waterways, without satisfying all of the pollution restrictions enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
