Search for: "US v. Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 1,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Record on Appeal
On February 25, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted its only application for cert for the month of February 2011 in a case styled Cox v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 8:20 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of Actual Innocence — Need for a hearing In 1991, Anthony Cox, appellant, was convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of first-degree murder, use of a firearm during a crime of violence, and wearing and carrying a handgun. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As an initial matter, Cox argued that it should be absolved from liability where its technology is capable of “substantial noninfringing uses. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
In am April 2018 filing related to that case, the RIAA argued that the appeals court ruling in BMG v Cox "affirmed the holdings ... that [we] rely on here, and expressly rejected the central arguments [Grande] advance in their motions to dismiss" and accused Grande of “refusing to take meaningful action against repeat infringers”,  users who repeatedly downloaded music illegally over BitTorrent networks.Now Sony, Universal and Warner are also… [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm by Annemarie Bridy
BMG’s evidence on this point was a survey showing that 16% of respondents used Cox’s service to infringe, and 70% of that 16% said they subscribed to the service at least in part because they could use it to infringe. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Citing the Grokstercase, Judge Motz states that substantial lawful use of a product does not exempt its producer from contributory infringement. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
” The court further bolsters its analysis with Supreme Court of Virginia case law (Parish v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:45 am by SHG
The use of this feed anywhere else violates copyright. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:59 am by Ben Snitkoff
There are additional problems with BMG’s theory that Cox is liable under a theory of vicarious liability because it sells faster connections which can be used for faster pirating (part of the theory of vicarious liability), and another weakness regarding potential open networks and inability to reliably trace infringement to a single user, rather than infringement through an account. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
I used the Navy JAG's recent reversal of the United States v. [read post]