Search for: "US Football League v. National Football League"
Results 1 - 20
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 8:02 am
Inc., has filed a lawsuit seeking declaratory judgment against the defendants National Football League Players Association, Inc., and the National Football League Players Incorporated (collectively hereinafter "NFL Players").The NFL Players Association acts as the exclusive collective bargaining representative for active players in the NFL. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 7:34 am
USA Football was endowed by the National Football League and the National Football League Players Association in 2002. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
National Football League (D. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:34 am
National Football League Players Association, -- F. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
National Football League, 130 S. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
So were people who bought Greek decoders, imported them into England and used them for watching English Premier League football matches infringing copyright or anti-decryption rules -- or was it the FAPL and its cohorts which were the villains for perpetrating anti-competitive practices and dividing up the European Union into separate national markets? [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
National Football League Players Association (11-10543), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a lawsuit against the National Football League Players Association’s (NFLPA). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
National Football League Players Association (11-10543), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a lawsuit against the National Football League Players Association’s (NFLPA). [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:00 am
If this story sound familiar to Kat readers, it is because similar facts were featured in a landmark CJEU decision of 2011, C-429/08 "Premier League v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
Perhaps Yahoo was willing to compromise on licensing fees and forego protracted litigation to protect a business relationship stretching beyond fantasy sports.The NFLPA is currently appealing the April decision of the similar case National Football League Players Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:22 am
It seems like the Premier League is launching at least 100 new actions against publicans who use foreign decoder cards to show live Premier League football matches in their pubs. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am
Unlike the National Football League, there is no draft for college football, and thus no way to ensure even a minimal distribution of talent. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
In National Football League Management Council et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:41 am
NFL [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the National Football League (NFL) [league website] and its member teams are not a single entity that is exempt from rule of reason claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act [text]. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
[1] In this case, the National Football League (NFL) is arguing that its teams operate as a single-entity and therefore cannot be held in violation of anti-trust laws. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
National Football League et al., No. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:17 pm
" The new case is National Football League Players Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
The Court reversed the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and held that the National Football League Properties’ (NFLP) exclusive licensing agreement with Reebok to produce headwear constitutes concerted action, and thus falls within the scope of § 1 of the Sherman Act, which outlaws any “contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
National Football League, 0:11-cv-00639-SRN-JJG (D. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
Buttressing this is the National Football League’s collective bargaining agreement with the teams and its players. [read post]
