Search for: "US Inventor" Results 21 - 40 of 8,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2019, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Folks at US Inventor, including Josh Malone and Paul Morinville, have lobbied for the proposal and have included substantial discussion on their website: https://www.usinventor.org/inventor-rights-act/. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Country of First Named Inventor FY2014 Patent Count Japan 54975 18% Germany 16730 5% Korea 16280 5% Taiwan 11303 4% China 7694 3% Canada 7218 2% France 6812 2% UK 6700 2% Israel 3453 1% India 3005 1% Sweden 2754 1%   * The numbers above are based upon the inventor country as listed for the first-named inventor on the face of each U.S. utility patent. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:40 pm by russ.krajec
I try to think of other industries that might use a similar process or device, or imagine performing the process on a micro or macro level. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:47 am by Michael White
Patent documents will only display the city and state for US inventors or the city and country for non-US residents.Privacy is a good thing. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 7:05 am by James Yang
So when you are trying to identify the inventors, you can use this paradigm of visionary, inventor, and scribe. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 5:54 am by USPTO
We heard those of you who told us that such a program could benefit inventors, and we look forward to helping do just that. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:00 pm
On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
Although the guest authors here used the term as a way to distinguish, my experience is that the first-inventor-to-file (FITF) terminology is more frequently used as a propaganda tool by proponents of the new US legislation. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Although the guest authors here used the term as a way to distinguish, my experience is that the first-inventor-to-file (FITF) terminology is more frequently used as a propaganda tool by proponents of the new US legislation. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:39 am by Jake Ward
Via press release from US Inventor today: INVENTORS REQUEST CORRECTION TO COVER OF 10 MILLIONTH PATENT (WASHINGTON, DC) – Today the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced issuance of the 10 millionth patent. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
An inventor must file within 12 months of an invention being offered for sale or used publicly, and third party activities unknown and unknowable to the inventor can and do frequently cause problems. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This patent is one that offers a number of lessons, both for inventors and for those who are seeking to reform the US patent process. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 8:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Vidal: This case presents the question of who, or what, can be an inventor. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:56 am by admin
  The inventor also should become accustomed to guarding against any use of the invention in public until the patent application is filed. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:15 am by Alec Pronk
An independent jury of former European Inventor Award finalists used their expertise to select this year’s finalists. [read post]