Search for: "US v. Cox"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
Cox case, the court says that simply making works available does not constitute distribution. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
Knowles v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 3:15 am
https://t.co/ILGAUG9DC0 2019-08-14 Procedural fighting in the flawed right to be forgotten Federal Court reference, Reference re Subsection 18.3(1) of… https://t.co/Uuy7nSmbdO 2019-08-16 RT @cagoldberglaw: Herrick v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:20 am
Chris Cox and Ron Wyden drafted what would become Section 230 in 1995, after Cox read a newspaper article about a New York state trial court’s ruling in Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
Another decision showing how pertinent evidence is during the lifetime of a trade mark.CopyrightThis kitten is wondering thesame questions...In a guest post, Katfriend Hugo Cox, covers the recent judgment in ATB Sales v Rich Energy in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, highlighting the significance of copyright law in the protection of brands.Katfriend Riana Harvey takes a look at the recent decision of the US Copyright Office Review Board which… [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
The law would apply to “providers of interactive computer services” with 30M US monthly average users (MAUs), 300M worldwide MAUs, or $500M/yr global revenue. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:31 am
David Cox, CEO of ARLA who have been sitting on the working group said here: For deposit passporting to work we need to ensure that both the outgoing landlord’s deposit can be used if needed, while the incoming landlord has certainty they will get the full deposit they have agreed by the tenant. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 11:20 pm
Samuels v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
JOpinion Editor’s note: Gary M. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
ARLA Propertymark chief executive David Cox said: Licensing schemes do not work, and never will. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
” State of Illinois v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Cox v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages ***” ( Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Cox, 93 AD3d 639, 640 [2d Dept 2012]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295… [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:44 am
So I may use their rulings as a basis for my decision on whether to allow it or not. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
Contact us via the Inforrm email: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Not using your prepaid credit card enough? [read post]
