Search for: "US v. Cox" Results 281 - 300 of 878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PTO registeredthe mark FUGLY for use on clothing, but refused registrationfor use on alcoholic beverages. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  When the term “specialized knowledge” is used, the trial lawyer thinks: “admissibility”, “lay juries” and “experts. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Marty Lederman
  See, e.g., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by Mandy Perry
 In a recent High Court case (Cox v Spencer [2017] EWHC 2552 (QB)), the employer was granted an order that meant it could image the employee’s computer to see if it contained any of their confidential information. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In such cases the owner is liable for failing to provide a safe place for the use of the invitee.Thus, in Brody v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Bork’s opponents were critical of his opinions about the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
By a majority of 4-1, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the local authority was vicariously liable in respect of abuse perpetrated by the foster parents (applying Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10), and even though the local authority was not negligent in connection with the foster placements. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 8:20 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of Actual Innocence — Need for a hearing In 1991, Anthony Cox, appellant, was convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of first-degree murder, use of a firearm during a crime of violence, and wearing and carrying a handgun. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, consolidated with Cox v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although the patent specification may not be used to rewrite the claim language, SuperGuide Corp. v. [read post]