Search for: "US v. Cox"
Results 21 - 40
of 905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 12:06 pm
” In a prior case (BMG v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:40 am
Cox & Thomas J. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
In Earl of the Family Cox v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior.… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior.… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
Adam Cox, Jacob Gersen, M. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:29 pm
Cox v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:50 pm
See Verizon Services Corp. et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:27 pm
United States [docket], Cox v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:55 am
United States [cert. petition, PDF] Cox v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Cox used marital assets to pay his attorney. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
The Global Impact The first question for those of us not in the USA is whether platforms like Twitter, used globally, will extend their fact-checking to other elections. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm
Emily Cox is a Partner and Head of Media Disputes at Stewarts [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Judge Sean Cox’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:08 am
Cox and UMG v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:34 pm
Cox in the Fourth Circuit and UMG v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:04 am
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
