Search for: "US v. Cox" Results 41 - 60 of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am by Jason Rantanen
  In this guest post he provides his observations of the damages testimony in VLSI Technologies v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 10:18 am
C&F reports that the Arkansas Supreme Court struck the following sentence from a brief in Cox v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm by Harry Graver
Dalmazzi consolidates with two other cases—Cox v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  When the term “specialized knowledge” is used, the trial lawyer thinks: “admissibility”, “lay juries” and “experts. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:04 pm
My treasured colleague, Capt Tim Cox, has filed a cert petition in Larson v. [read post]