Search for: "US v. Cox"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
Polk v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:11 pm
Cox, 2012 La. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
Cox, 942 A.2d 296 (Conn. 2008). [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 5:14 am
US (not yet) US. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:54 am
Cox, Randall T. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Hilliard v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:07 am
***Separately, on the subject of Facebook, see the complaint filed in CD California, EveryMD v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:24 pm
Anchor Hanover Group v Cox (2023) UKUT 14 (LC) (Copy of judgment here. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
As for Cox's own intentions, according to the Court, he did not want to stop Pangyrus using the Colourblind sign, but nor was there any common understanding that the mark belonged to Pangyrus.So where does this decision leave us? [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:29 pm
The fight for fair use heads to the Supreme Court in Lenz v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am
In the case Gevo v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
Cox is a research consultant for the Brooklyn-based Institute for Juvenile Justice Reform and Alternatives.The Supreme Court will decide next year about whether they will allow the use of life without parole for juvenile offenders. [read post]
14 May 2017, 7:01 am
" City of Des Plaines v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:41 am
Kim v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
Cox v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 11:39 am
Cox (D. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
" After all, as the Fab Four noted, "no one will be watching us in the road" -- a dubious proposition, but assuming it's true, why not? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:46 am
Kim v. [read post]
