Search for: "US v. Jones" Results 61 - 80 of 4,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 1:36 am by sally
We look at the employment law implications for use of social media in some depth and discuss the important case of Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:36 am by sally
We look at the employment law implications for use of social media in some depth and discuss the important case of Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:36 am by sally
We look at the employment law implications for use of social media in some depth and discuss the important case of Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch). [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:30 pm
The Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 30104) is the primary law used by seamen to recover compensatory damages from their employers for injuries sustained in accidents occurring on navigable waters. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:45 pm by 1-800-OBRYANS
In 2005, the court determined the word “vessel” was defined in Stewart v Dutra Construction Co. as “every description of water-craft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:45 pm by 1-800-OBRYANS
In 2005, the court determined the word “vessel” was defined in Stewart v Dutra Construction Co. as “every description of water-craft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:59 am by Woodrow Hartzog
Jones, in which the Justices held that the government's installation of a GPS device on a target's vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle's movements, constituted a Fourth Amendment search. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:43 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’m about to head off to teach an 11am class about the reasonable expectation of privacy test, using the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Mr Kernott used his share of the proceeds as a deposit for a home of his own.  [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm by Bill Otis
 But they couldn't.Third, standing Supreme Court precedent holds that use of acquitted conduct is proper, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
Indeed, three years after Jones, in Griffin v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:59 pm by Orin Kerr
Jones, it’s that not very much is clear from the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]