Search for: "US v. Jones" Results 81 - 100 of 4,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 6:06 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The ACS claims that the mother’s use of marijuana establishes a case for parental wrongdoing and that a prima facie case isn’t defended by merely showing that the children weren’t harmed. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:59 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Moritz College of Law) have posted How to Address Standardless Discretion after Jones on SSRN. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:40 am by sally
Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 824; [2011] WLR (D) 236 “The first tier and upper tribunals were statutory appellate tribunals which had not been given any original jurisdiction for resolving disputes as to whether or not goods were imported legally for personal use. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:13 am by David Fraser
The US Supreme Court has just released its unanimous decision in US v Jones [PDF], in which the Court held that law enforcement need either a warrant or the owner's permission to attach a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 4:30 am by Matthew Pitman
This post was written by Matthew Pitman and Abigail Jones. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:38 am
"Which led me to conclude, correctly, that the Jones family was going to win the appeal. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm by Sam Bayard
(source) Not surprisingly, this "sweat of the brow" logic is reminiscent of the reasoning in Judge Cote's influential decision in Barclays v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:33 pm
Jones, where the President is sued for actions outside of his official duties as President of the United States, but different from Clinton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:04 am by David Stein
In light of extreme secrecy surrounding the use of surveillance devices, the case of Prince Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:53 am
Family Law Week reports today that the eagerly-awaited Supreme Court hearing in Kernott v Jones begins tomorrow (the headline of their report says today, but the report itself correctly says tomorrow). [read post]