Search for: "US v. Juvenile Male #3" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
Juvenile Male, 09–940, presents the question, “Whether application of the registration and notification provisions of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) to a juvenile who was adjudicated delinquent under the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act before SORNA’s enactment violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  Everything you say will be used against you. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:20 pm
The same two males along with a third local juvenile male were also arrested later the same evening for burglary of a business…. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
IMM, Juvenile Male, Ninth Circuit: Appellant's conviction for child sex abuse was reversed and remanded because Appellant was not Mirandized and was in custody when he made inculpatory statements. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:07 pm
Maricopa County (Phoenix, AZ) Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who instituted such ridiculous shaming punishments as forcing male inmates to wear pink underwear, making juveniles serve on chain gangs and bury the dead, and requiring inmates to sleep in tents, is the subject of a new class action lawsuit by the ACLU and others for racial profiling of Latinos. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Online stalking and threats are hot topics today, especially in light of the Supreme Court granting cert in US v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
Under certain circumstances, I'm not against the use of private contractors for specialized corrections services, but these arguments far overstate privatization's benefits and encourage lawmakers to see private prisons as a way to do things on the cheap.UPDATE: An alert reader points me to this July 2003 study comparing publicly operated and private juvenile corrections facilities. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:28 am by Lorene Park
In a second dissenting opinion, Judge Jones reasoned that “sex talk doesn’t always mean that sex is involved” and that the conduct here was boorish and juvenile but not “because of” sex. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm by admin
” Mosby-Grant felt ostracized in part because of her classmates’ “juvenile behavior,” including their constant use of sexist language and disparaging remarks about women. [read post]