Search for: "US v. Kale" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 5:11 pm
And more recently, it was Sandra Day O’Connor who reminded us in Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:29 pm by Aparna Chandra
SCC 121, and also raised the issue of its non-consideration by later two-judge Benches [Bharat Damodar Kale v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by Chris Castle
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:40 pm by Steve Baird
New York Times Covers “Eat More Kale” Trademark Dispute Chick-fil-A Goes Stealth in “Eat More Kale” Trademark Dispute? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm by Eric
I assume most kale eaters don't overlap with Chik-fil-A consumers. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Lara
to a blog post on Blurt about Chick-fil-A’s apparent bullying of Robert (“Bo”) Muller-Moore over his use of EAT MORE KALE. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:07 am by Susan Brenner
Cell phone records indicate that Kale called Buonanno several times that evening using a cell phone tower in Pennsauken, New Jersey. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Christopher G. Hill
For example, in a recent case out of Fairfax County, Artitech, Inc. v. [read post]