Search for: "US v. Kent" Results 81 - 100 of 1,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
In particular, they used a battering ram to break down the... [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm by Kali Borkoski
  There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm
  This same idea was echoed by later influential jurists such as New York's Chancellor Kent in cases like Livingston v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:35 am
Kent Doesn't Mince Words, Texas Lawyer, July 16, 2001, at 5, 5 (quoting order in Labor Force v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:05 pm by Bill Otis
 Having of late been clobbered in both (as Kent's contribution points out), abolitionism could use to be honest about its failures. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/CZXHiGY96X -> Google's fair use defence succeeds against Oracle's copyright infringement claim https://t.co/ZAVUFTU20n -> Federal Court Issues Injunction Directed at Retailers of Set-Top Boxes With Copyright Infringing Applications https://t.co/HUsi6j7isG -> Link to Bell v https://t.co/ELYNrALMY8 case https://t.co/94ozzoPQSq -> [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:30 pm
  Maybe even most cases.Reading Kent's take on Herring is like reading a bad anti-Utopian short story, one where a government purports to give us rights, but takes away any penalty for violating them. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
” Elsewhere at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the Court’s denial of a stay to a Florida death-row inmate; he suggests that, no matter what “the Court may decide on the merits in”Hurst v. [read post]