Search for: "US v. Monroe Herring" Results 1 - 20 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Plaintiff Must Answer Questions at IME or DMEIn the Monroe County case of Nelson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
District Court Judge Karoline Mehalchick of the Middle District of Pennsylvania crafted and issued what appears to be the first civil practice order on use of generative artificial intelligence to be issued in the commonwealth.Under this order, Mehalchick requires any party to any litigation pending before her that has utilized AI in preparation of any filing, to include with the filing a certificate of use of generative AI. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Therefore, the model can’t justifiably be employed by a judge who claims to apply originalist methods and used as the basis for a legal rule about how federal and state power interact today. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
President Harris's court packing bill, if it applied retroactively, would change the Supreme Court from a 6 to 3 majority of voting moderate, libertarian, and conservative Republican-appointed Justices to a 6 to 3 majority of voting progressive Democratic-appointed Justices through her new appointees. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  Here I wish to propose adding one more entry to her list, which following her lead one might call “A Federalism of Forgetting and Reimagining. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
Last week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its decision in Catholic Charities v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
The tweet was therefore not defamatory, and so Ms Thorp abandoned her claim. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
For the first time on this blog, the corporate opportunity and faithless servant doctrines converge in Owen v Hurlbut, 80 Misc 3d 1234(A) [Sup Ct, Monroe County Nov. 2, 2023]). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Ms Goldsmith subsequently informed the Foundation that they had infringed her copyright in her picture, which then lead to the Foundation suing Ms Goldmith asserting fair use. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Ms Goldsmith subsequently informed the Foundation that they had infringed her copyright in her picture, which then lead to the Foundation suing Ms Goldmith asserting fair use. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Sam L. [read post]