Search for: "US v. Monroe Herring" Results 161 - 180 of 316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
In that case, the Monroe County Family Court held the legal father to the support obligation, writing, "However, by her course of conduct in this case which brought into the world two innocent children she should not be allowed to benefit from those acts to the detriment of these children and of the public generally. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Jeanne Kornowicz, a school psychologist in the Cheektowaga Central School District in Erie County, applied to her employer to add her spouse, Joy Higgins, to her insurance coverage after the New York Appellate Division, 4th Department, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
  Abigail Roberson, age 17, was distressed to discover that a photograph of her was being used in an advertisement for the Franklin Mills Flour Company. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Disclaimer: I act for both claimants and defendants, including in two of the cases cited above – Monroe v Hopkins & Singh v Weayou. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 11:32 pm
- Legal equality (e.g. the Second Hague Peace Conference)- Prohibition of the use of force to collect sovereign debt- Etc.6. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
It is alleged that in the months leading up to the murders, Coleman used his work computer to email death threats directed at himself, the decedents, and Joyce Meyer Ministries, Inc.Regions Bank v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 19 March 2010, the Appellate Division granted defendants leave to appeal, and certified to us the question of whether its order was properly made. [read post]