Search for: "US v. Rose" Results 181 - 200 of 2,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2023, 11:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Charles V, Ferdinand and Isabella’s grandson, added a Renaissance place to the center of the compound [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
George the Martyr Preston [2023] ECC Bla 2] [Post] [Top of section] [Top of post] Reordering and alternative uses Re St. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm by Aaron Moss
” On April 26, UMG held an earnings call in which it reported that revenues rose 11.5% year over year to $2.71 billion in the first quarter of 2023, largely driven by successful releases from Morgan Wallen, Taylor Swift, and the aforementioned Drake. [read post]
” In March, the North Dakota Supreme Court blocked the state’s trigger abortion ban that went into effect after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am by CMS
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:54 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Atlantic: “Last week, a district court judge in New York ruled on Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Acuff-Rose Music, SCOTUS held that the 2 Live Crew version of Roy Orbison's song Pretty Woman was a parody and thus fair use within copyright law. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by David Priess
Podcast theme by David Priess, featuring music created using Groovepad. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Benjamin Goh
Marcel Pemsel commented on the recent English High Court decision Interdigital v Lenovo, regarding FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) licensing rates for patents. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The measures are intended to add an extra layer of control over who can access the data of European uses. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Her jurisdiction jurisprudence rose to meet that challenge. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am by Stewart Baker
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]