Search for: "US v. Rose" Results 121 - 140 of 2,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
And while the number of dividend recaps fell dramatically when interest rates rose in 2022, they appear to be making a marked resurgence in 2023. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Resisting criticism, that Chief Justice declared himself the undisputed ‘master of the roster’, and recent accounts show that Chief Justices continue to use this power strategically in assigning cases. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation  to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
(Indeed, one of us (Rose-Ackerman) was even troubled to see her co-authored article on judicial review of executive policymaking misused to buttress such claims. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm by David Badertscher
Use of the death penalty in the United States rose gradually during the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth  centuries with a sharp rise in the twentieth century until 1972 when a moratorium was established by the U.S. [read post]
  This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
In addition, the only factor within the assessment of fair use remained the first factor, i.e. whether "the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes" weighs in Ms Goldsmith's favor or if the work would be considered 'transformative'.The first factor specifically looks at whether, as has been firmly established in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music Inc:… [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
In addition, the only factor within the assessment of fair use remained the first factor, i.e. whether "the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes" weighs in Ms Goldsmith's favor or if the work would be considered 'transformative'.The first factor specifically looks at whether, as has been firmly established in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music Inc:… [read post]