Search for: "USA v. AL Power Company, et al" Results 81 - 100 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Ryders Eyewear (Docket Report)   US Copyright Obama signals support for ACTA treaty (Copyright Litigation Blog) Copyright, TM and counterfeit chic: Fordham Law launches Fashion Law Institute (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions 1st Cir: Implied non-exclusive license survives death of architect: Estate of Robert Hevia et al v Portrio Corporation et al (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2d Cir: Tortious interference and conversion… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
  The Climate Post: Court Hears Arguments Surrounding EPA Power Plant Rule State of West Virginia, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
As Chairman Schapiro explained the change, “in investigations that require subpoena power, time is always of the essence. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
United StatesDocket: 09-1227Issue(s): Whether a criminal defendant convicted under a federal statute has standing to challenge her conviction on grounds that, as applied to her, the statute is beyond the federal government’s enumerated powers and inconsistent with the Tenth Amendment.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (3d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Von Saher v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat),… [read post]