Search for: "USA v. Mark Garcia"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for… [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:30 am
That can’t be far off the mark, at least as to those who deal with video tracking. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
"To establish an occupational disease, the claimant must demonstrate a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her employment[, and] the Board's decision as to whether to classify a certain medical condition as an occupational disease is a factual determination that will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Urdiales v Durite Concepts Inc/Durite USA, 199 AD3d 1214, 1214 [2021] [internal quotation… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
"To establish an occupational disease, the claimant must demonstrate a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her employment[, and] the Board's decision as to whether to classify a certain medical condition as an occupational disease is a factual determination that will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Urdiales v Durite Concepts Inc/Durite USA, 199 AD3d 1214, 1214 [2021] [internal quotation… [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At the ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia assesses Monday’s argument in Epic Systems v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Mark Burck, for Hiawatha Henry, Appellee.Edward Hubbard, Patrick E. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
USA Today. 89.3 KPCC. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:50 am
Check it out: http://t.co/T8Xlvbrdvi — INTA (@INTA) May 14, 2015 Today’s 9th Cir en banc opinion in Garcia v Google is the most direct repudiation yet of ‘IP immigration. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
" Id. at 998 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
At The Conversation, Ruben Garcia points to his own research in Nevada to argue that Wednesday’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
