Search for: "USP Holdings, Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am by Jason Rantanen
Dispute Over Method 207 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) is an SDO that develops standards for testing the quality and purity of foods and drugs. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
In the case, Myrna Gomez-Perez was employed by the United States Postal Service (USPS) and was 45 years old at the time when she requested a job transfer. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 7:07 am by DONALD SCARINCI
In 2012, Groff took a mail delivery job with the United States Postal Service. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:25 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
Gerald Groff, the plaintiff in Groff, was an evangelical Christian rural postal carrier employed by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in Pennsylvania. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§§ 1.6(a)(2), 2.195(a)(4), and 2.198 provide that certain correspondence deposited in the Priority Mail Express® service of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in accordance with 37 C.F.R. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 3:47 pm
Contract Transport, Inc., the plaintiff worked as a trucker for Byrd Trucking, driving a Philadelphia-Denver route for the United States Postal Service (USPS). [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Atovaquone Oral Suspension, USP 750 mg/5mL, has been recalled by KVK Tech, Inc. due to defects resulting from exposure to extreme temperatures during shipping. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Cases where the foreign state was not party to the Convention Rio Props., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:32 am by Jo Dale Carothers
Postal Service, et al. and Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]