Search for: "USPTO" Results 1 - 20 of 18,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
For instance, see the accepted descriptions in classes 9, 35 and 41 for UK IPO here (if needed, search for “virtual” and then click on search) and for USPTO here on TMclass (if required, select USPTO and then click on search).As regards designs, the advance electronic publication of the 14th edition of the Locarno Classification (see here) that will also enter into force on 1 January 2023, already includes… [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
Fraud: PepsiCo alleged that Arriero, in its application, made three false statements with the intent to deceive the USPTO: that Arriero is "entitled to use the mark;" that it had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce; and that no other person had a right to use a confusingly similar mark. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 10:33 am by Tom Kosakowski
 Moderator: Herschenia Brown, In Agreement Dispute Resolution Panelists: Alicia Booker, Baylor College of Medicine; Andrea Brown, USPTO Office of the Ombudsman; Amanda Dean, Austin Community College (ACC);  Elizabeth Hill, University of Colorado Boulder;  Salli Pung, Michigan Long Term Care Ombudsman Program; Natalie Sharpe, University of Alberta; Margie Sollinger, City of Portland, Oregon The Making of an OmbudsLive Video Airing 2:45 pm ET Meet… [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
" The Board noted that, when a specific day is not given, the USPTO, for examination purposes, presumes that the first use date is the last day of the month stated. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:13 pm by Eileen McDermott
In June of this year, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal replied to a late April request by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) for answers to a number of questions surrounding abuse of the inter partes review (IPR) system, explaining that she was working on the problem. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:13 pm by Eileen McDermott
In June of this year, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal replied to a late April request by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) for answers to a number of questions surrounding abuse of the inter partes review (IPR) system, explaining that she was working on the problem. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:54 am by Holly Brezee
USPTO patent examiners carefully review every patent application. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Directors Andrei Iancu and David Kappos, Retired U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Directors Andrei Iancu and David Kappos, Retired U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:31 am
The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark THE CHIRO PLACE, in standard form ("CHIRO" disclaimed), finding confusion likely with the registered mark THE CHIRO SPOT ("CHIRO" disclaimed), both for chiropractic services. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm by imagine
To renew a registered trademark, the owner must file the maintenance documents with the United States Patent Trademark Office (USPTO) and meet certain legal requirements. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:09 am by Dennis Crouch
The USPTO’s fiscal year ends at the end of September, so this chart is slightly preemptive. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:03 am by James Yang
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has a three tiered fee structure. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 3:00 pm by Eileen McDermott
Hoyle filed the suit in the Western District of Tennessee’s Western Division in August 2021 against former USPTO Director Michelle Lee and a number of other former USPTO officials for allegedly depriving the plaintiffs “of their valuable property rights in quasi-judicial administrative proceedings before the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘PTAB’). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 3:00 pm by Eileen McDermott
Hoyle filed the suit in the Western District of Tennessee’s Western Division in August 2021 against former USPTO Director Michelle Lee and a number of other former USPTO officials for allegedly depriving the plaintiffs “of their valuable property rights in quasi-judicial administrative proceedings before the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘PTAB’). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:48 am by Dennis Crouch
  In particular, the USPTO granted institution of most of the challenged claims of Click-to-Call’s US5818836 based upon the “Dezonno” reference, but denied institution with-regard-to claim 27 and also refused to conduct an IPR relying upon the Freeman reference (the only ground raised in the IPR for challenging claim 27). [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 7:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
The court sided with USPTO’s no-patent stance. [read post]