Search for: "USPTO" Results 41 - 60 of 18,803
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 7:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
It is unclear how this proposal benefits the USPTO. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:36 pm by Matt Kurnick
The post USPTO Stands Behind Significant New Fees for 2025 appeared first on Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:13 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On January 23, 2024, the Federal Circuit granted the USPTO’s request for a remand in the case of In re Xencor, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Holly
  Let’s briefly review the process of obtaining a trademark, which begins with an application submitted to a trademark office, which in the US is the USPTO. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This paradigm shift has not gone unnoticed by the guardians of intellectual property, with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the US Copyright Office at the forefront, delineating the boundaries of human and machine creativity. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm by Patent Docs
By Joshua Rich -- In a Federal Register notice dated March 29, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 11:00 am by Emily Theriault
In Global Patent Solutions, LLC,[5] the GAO sustained a protest challenging the award of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity contract by the Department of Commerce, United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for professional services to assist the USPTO in reviewing international patent applications. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:21 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark OTTO'S for "soda pops," finding confusion likely with the registered mark OTTO’S OATMEAL STOUT for “beer” [OATMEAL STOUT disclaimed]. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:47 am
That opinion had originally been deemed nonprecedential, but at the USPTO's request, the court re-designated it as precedential. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by thomasgalvani
Obtain a VMC with a Registered Trademark There are a few public and private requirements for obtaining a VMC: Registered trademark – you must have applied for and been granted a trademark by the USPTO Properly formatted image of your logo – more information here: https://bimigroup.org/svg-conversion-tools-released/ DMARC enforcement – more information here: https://www.digicert.com/faq/email-trust/What-is-dmarc A BIMI record for your domain – more information here:… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
The USPTO is proposing to increase many trademark fees in Fiscal Year 2025. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Shane McCall
GAO sustained the protest because USPTO did not follow its own solicitation requirements in evaluating a teaming agreement. [read post]