Search for: "USPTO"
Results 61 - 80
of 18,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
This paradigm shift has not gone unnoticed by the guardians of intellectual property, with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the US Copyright Office at the forefront, delineating the boundaries of human and machine creativity. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm
By Joshua Rich -- In a Federal Register notice dated March 29, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 11:00 am
In Global Patent Solutions, LLC,[5] the GAO sustained a protest challenging the award of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity contract by the Department of Commerce, United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for professional services to assist the USPTO in reviewing international patent applications. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:21 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark OTTO'S for "soda pops," finding confusion likely with the registered mark OTTO’S OATMEAL STOUT for “beer” [OATMEAL STOUT disclaimed]. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:47 am
That opinion had originally been deemed nonprecedential, but at the USPTO's request, the court re-designated it as precedential. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Obtain a VMC with a Registered Trademark There are a few public and private requirements for obtaining a VMC: Registered trademark – you must have applied for and been granted a trademark by the USPTO Properly formatted image of your logo – more information here: https://bimigroup.org/svg-conversion-tools-released/ DMARC enforcement – more information here: https://www.digicert.com/faq/email-trust/What-is-dmarc A BIMI record for your domain – more information here:… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
The USPTO is proposing to increase many trademark fees in Fiscal Year 2025. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:07 am
GAO sustained the protest because USPTO did not follow its own solicitation requirements in evaluating a teaming agreement. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 3:58 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark HIGH FIVE for “Pizza for consumption on or off the premises," finding confusion likely with the identical mark registered for "bakery goods. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:20 am
That case is now before the Appeal Review Panel at the USPTO following remand from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) this week issued a memorandum related to guidelines for examining patent claims with means-plus-function and step-plus-function limitations under 35 USC § 112(f). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) this week issued a memorandum related to guidelines for examining patent claims with means-plus-function and step-plus-function limitations under 35 USC § 112(f). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) this week issued a memorandum related to guidelines for examining patent claims with means-plus-function and step-plus-function limitations under 35 USC § 112(f). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) this week issued a memorandum related to guidelines for examining patent claims with means-plus-function and step-plus-function limitations under 35 USC § 112(f). [read post]
