Search for: "UTAH PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Utah 2012) (hereinafter U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Associates First Capital Corp., 2001 WL 35948712, at *23 (D. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Utah State Tax CommissionDocket: 09-1442Issue(s): 1) Whether Utah Code Ann. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of the American Legion Amicus brief of New Tribes Mission Amicus brief of Becket Fund for Religious Liberty Amicus brief of Utah Sheriffs’ Association Amicus brief of American Civil Rights Union   Utah Highway Patrol Ass’n v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:36 am by Amber Walsh
Based in Greenwich, Conn., the firm invests exclusively in healthcare companies in the United States, Canada and Western Europe. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Bliss d/b/a Roger Bliss and Associates Equities, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, d/b/a Roger Bliss and Associates Club LLC, d/b/a Bliss Club LLCCase number: 15-cv-00098 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: February 11, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 19, 2016 5/31/2016 8/29/2016 2016-74 SEC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
  First up is Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the National… [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way.  [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Plaintiffs allegedly exposed to harm—from asbestos, tobacco, toxics, pharmaceuticals, and devices—will surely rely on Associate Justice Walters’ concurrence in Lowe to try to reopen the door to medical monitoring relief. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]