Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 6:12 am by admin
 See, NLRB Advice Memorandum Dated April 16, 2019, Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
Uber Technologies, the California Supreme Court recognized that the proper course for a trial court to take after compelling an employee’s individual PAGA claim to arbitration is to stay the non-individual PAGA claim. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:55 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
These cases were recently consolidated into a new class action MDL (In re: Uber Technologies Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation – MDL No. 3084). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
How does a Court assess a class action claim against a high-tech giant where the evidence is that the plaintiff reaffirmed the conditions of use numerous times in making her transactions in the world following the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal case in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
“I fought the law and the law won” – The Crickets In an opinion filed July 19, and later ordered published on August 16, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) reversed the trial court’s grant of a preliminary injunction in a CEQA action enjoining the Santa Barbara County Road Commissioner from enforcing public laws by removing unpermitted encroachments from a public right-of-way. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:59 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 1023 EDA 2021 (Pa. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:09 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Uber Technologies, Inc. ostensibly deals a significant blow to employers by holding that an employee compelled to arbitrate claims under the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) maintains standing to bring PAGA action on behalf of aggrieved employees in court. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]