Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., Docket 15-16178, 15-16250, for publication, opinion by Judge Richard Clifton, Sept. 7, 2016).Droit de l’”agency” : la pratique judiciaire a montré que les mémoires dans des actions contre plusieurs défendeurs contiennent régulièrement le simple allégué de partie affirmant sans autres que tous les défendeurs étaient agents ou employés les uns des autres et… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:35 am by Stephen Pitel
The Supreme Court of Canada has held in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Uber (and Kalanick) moved to compel arbitration on the basis of the arbitration clause in Uber’s terms of service. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
How does a Court assess a class action claim against a high-tech giant where the evidence is that the plaintiff reaffirmed the conditions of use numerous times in making her transactions in the world following the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal case in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:45 am by Evan Mix
Uber Technologies, Inc. are putative class actions by current and former drivers for the popular taxi alternatives Lyft and Uber who allege that the companies improperly classified them as independent contractors rather than employees. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:55 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., Docket 15-16178, 15-16250, for publication, opinion by Judge Richard Clifton).Procédure, contenu des mémoires, manquer à citer un allégué au plus tard dans la réponse : le 9è Circuit fédéral observe en l’espèce que les demandeurs ont allégué un fait pour la première fois dans une réponse additionnelle. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:53 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In re Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 7:40 pm by Patent Docs
Startups & Inventors for Jobs (USU); Bill Harmon, Director, IP and Trademarks, Uber Technologies, Inc.; Philip Hirschhorn of Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP; and Liane Peterson of Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]