Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
How does a Court assess a class action claim against a high-tech giant where the evidence is that the plaintiff reaffirmed the conditions of use numerous times in making her transactions in the world following the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal case in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
“I fought the law and the law won” – The Crickets In an opinion filed July 19, and later ordered published on August 16, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) reversed the trial court’s grant of a preliminary injunction in a CEQA action enjoining the Santa Barbara County Road Commissioner from enforcing public laws by removing unpermitted encroachments from a public right-of-way. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:12 pm
Uber Tech., Inc., 82 F. [read post]
California’s High Court Authorizes Stay Of Non-Individual PAGA Claims During Pendency Of Arbitration
7 Aug 2023, 10:20 am
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:59 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 1023 EDA 2021 (Pa. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:09 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. ostensibly deals a significant blow to employers by holding that an employee compelled to arbitrate claims under the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) maintains standing to bring PAGA action on behalf of aggrieved employees in court. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:21 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. marks a major shift back in favor of workers. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:49 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
Uber Technologies to address this issue. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:39 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 4:30 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., meaning that their claims may live on way past the first volley. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
