Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2022, 6:49 am by Evan Brown
Uber Technologies, Inc., — A.3d —, 2022 WL 244113 (Maine, January 27, 2022) The post Uber’s signup process did not create enforceable arbitration provision appeared first on Evan Brown. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 12:43 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
Inspire Brands Inc. has in its portfolio Dunkin’, Arby’s, SONIC Drive In, Jimmy John’s and others. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
It is not just technology companies that record regular operating losses. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:54 pm by Bona Law PC
Uber Technologies, Inc., the court dismissed the claim because the plaintiff did not allege barriers to entry or expansion for new or existing competitors sufficient to allow defendant to recoup its losses. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 My presentation, galloping across a bunch of developments. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 8:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 9:19 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., 486 Mass. 557 (2021), the Court declined to enforce an arbitration clause in Uber’s online terms and conditions. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
 Introduction The following Comments are respectfully submitted by the signatory organizations Songwriters Guild of America, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 8:00 am by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has found that Uber Technologies, Inc. violated the privacy of an estimated 1.2 million Australians, and failed to investigate and disclose a data breach from 2016 in a timely manner. [read post]