Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Kings Park Manor, Inc., for instance, the Second Circuit sitting en banc refused to hold a landlord liable for its tenants' racial harassment of fellow tenants, partly because of concern that such responsibility would pressure landlords to exercise undue power over tenants: [Under the alternative proposed by Francis,] prospective and current renters would confront more restrictive leases rife with in terrorem clauses, intensified tenant screening procedures, and intrusions into their… [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm
Uber Technologies Inc., No. 3:19-cv-06462 (N.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 1:16 pm
The increased attention that the gig economy is receiving from the FTC should serve as a wake-up call for technology companies providing matching or aggregating services. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 3:19-cv-06462 (N.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:44 am
Interestingly, financial technology (“fintech”) commentators, such as GlobalData analyst Jaimani Pattani, believe that Reddit’s financial subreddit forums could provide value as young investors continue to flock to tools like Robinhood, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 7:44 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. (1st Cir. 2018) 893 F.3d 53, 63 (Cullinane); Berkson, supra, 97 F.Supp.3d at pp. 403–404.) [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Motorola Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., 2022 ME 8 (Me. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 6:49 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., — A.3d —, 2022 WL 244113 (Maine, January 27, 2022) The post Uber’s signup process did not create enforceable arbitration provision appeared first on Evan Brown. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 12:43 pm
Inspire Brands Inc. has in its portfolio Dunkin’, Arby’s, SONIC Drive In, Jimmy John’s and others. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
It is not just technology companies that record regular operating losses. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:54 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., the court dismissed the claim because the plaintiff did not allege barriers to entry or expansion for new or existing competitors sufficient to allow defendant to recoup its losses. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
LVJ, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Uber Technologies Inc., No. 3:16-cv-03044 (D.N.J. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Key Facts Razar Contracting involved a dispute between a contractor, Evoqua Water Technologies Canada Ltd. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
My presentation, galloping across a bunch of developments. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 7:24 am
On June 1, 2021 the Southern District of Florida granted the motion by Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:26 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 20-cv-9224 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:12 am
Uber Inc. v. [read post]
