Search for: "Ulmer v. Ulmer"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
From yesterday's decision in Human Rights Defense Center v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Ulmer of the San Francisco Superior Court on Friday issued a tentative order denying a preliminary injunction bid by descendants of the school founder who oppose legislation that would rename the school following an investigation that concluded Hastings had perpetrated genocidal acts against Native Californians.The decision comes about three months after the group, including school alumni and Hastings descendants, sued the state and the school in an effort to block the school from being… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:15 pm
” (Ulmer v Municipal Ct., 55 Cal App 3d 263, 266 [Ct App 1976]). [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:00 am
Christopher V. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:07 am
Mapes v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
Section 12(v) permits hotels and motels to remain open, but food can only be sold for delivery or carry out. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:53 pm
The argument is similar to that raised Singh v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Eric Fick, the program executive officer for the F-35 Lightning II joint program office; Diana Maurer, the director of the defense capabilities and management team at the Government Accountability Office; Gregory Ulmer, the vice president and general manager of the F-35 program at Lockheed Martin; and Matthew Bromberg, the president of the military engines program at Pratt & Whitney. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
Illum v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Wilson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:47 am
Eugen Ulmer KG Bjorn Arp, Georgia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:31 pm
We’ve got it covered today in the roundup, and for even more analysis on the big Affordable Care Act ruling in King v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The German Federal Court of JusticeLast September this blog reported [here and here] on the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in TU Darmstadt v Ulmer, C-117/13, a reference from the Bundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice) seeking clarification as to the interpretation of relevant exceptions in the InfoSoc Directive - these being Article 5(2)(c) and Article 5(3)(n) - that allow, amongst others,… [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
David Price (Podcast) http://t.co/HYGGaObTmt -> Copyright exceptions and user rights in Case C-117/13 Ulmer: a couple of observations http://t.co/16DXnsp9EZ -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-09-21 http://t.co/XCOgOG8CbP -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-09-21: Life After CASL – Now What? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Ulmer, Dept. 624, and a jury). [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
Last week this blog reported on the latest addition to the copyright collection of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), this being the decision in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG.In this case the Court ruled that Article 5(3)(n) of the InfoSoc Directive, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of the same directive, must be interpreted as allowing Member States to grant – at certain conditions – publicly… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
The iconic automotive company Ferrari was not particularly happy with his interpretation, and Katfriend Lucy Harrold speculates how things would go if the eclectic Canadian would have done that in the UK.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that libraries may digitise books and make them available at e-reading points, and that licences do not prevent exceptionsEleonora pens about the CJEU’s decision in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer… [read post]
