Search for: "Underhill v State" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:16 am by Hopkins
Stefan Underhill, was asked by RJ Reynolds to overturn a jury verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $28 million (Izzarelli v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:28 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Nonetheless, the employer stated that it had dismissed her because of a lack of competence. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Police can take her into custody under Illinois law” [Jeffrey Schwab, Illinois Policy] So many stars to sue: Huang v. leading Hollywood names [Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar] Morgan Spurlock’s claim in 2004’s Super Size Me of eating only McDonald’s food for a month and coming out as a physical wreck with liver damage was one that later researchers failed to replicate; now confessional memoir sheds further doubt on baseline assertions essential to… [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Sarah Waller
Sutton v Norwich (2021) EWCA Civ 20, on appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (2020) UKUT 0090 (LC), 20th March 2020. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 11:30 pm by Stuart Clark
More formally, the rule is stated as follows in Underhill and Hayton: Law of Trusts and Trustees (14th ed. 1987), at p. 628: If there is only one beneficiary, or if there are several (whether entitled concurrently or successively) and they are all of one mind, and he or they are not under any disability, the specific performance of the trust may be arrested, and the trust modified or extinguished by him or them without reference to the wishes of the settlor or trustees. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals strikes down the law under the Equal Protection Clause.The case is Dandamudi v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
  On 1 February 2021 Underhill LJ ordered that the hearing should take place if possible between 15 and 31 March 2021. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the trial court was wrong and defendant's counsel cannot argue jury nullification.The case is United States v. [read post]