Search for: "Underhill v State" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The University of Strathclyde has commented on this issues stating that “Digital surveillance holds one in five of writers back”. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Internet Cases Blog has published there articles covering significant recent cases in the United States: A summary judgment was recently awarded in favour of Chanel following the luxury brands challenge to the registrant of the domain name <chanelgraffitti.com>. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
As we have already mentioned, on Tuesday 23 October 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Underhill V-P and Henderson LJ) handed down judgment in ABC v Telegraph Media Group [2018] EWCA Civ 2329. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Police can take her into custody under Illinois law” [Jeffrey Schwab, Illinois Policy] So many stars to sue: Huang v. leading Hollywood names [Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar] Morgan Spurlock’s claim in 2004’s Super Size Me of eating only McDonald’s food for a month and coming out as a physical wreck with liver damage was one that later researchers failed to replicate; now confessional memoir sheds further doubt on baseline assertions essential to… [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
"TEXT OF DRUG DOG SNIFF OPINIONDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LEE JASON UNDERHILL, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]