Search for: "Underhill v. Hernandez"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
The Supreme Court said in Underhill v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
I waited to write about it until I could get a copy of the search warrant affidavit — helpfully provided by my friend Kevin Underhill of the absolutely essential legal blog Lowering the Bar — so that I could address this question: what quantum of proof is required in New Mexico for the police and compliant doctors to rape and torture a man? [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
We point out, inter alia, that extraterritorial application of the ATS in most cases violates the Court’s longstanding proscription (first enunciated in 1897 in Underhill v Hernandez) against allowing U.S. courts to “sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another, done within its own territory. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
Hernandez (1897) to W S Kirkpatrick Co., Inc. v. [read post]
