Search for: "Uniloc USA Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a district court decision that Uniloc USA, Inc., Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. and Uniloc 2017 all lacked standing to sue Motorola and Blackboard for patent infringement because it was collaterally estopped by a previous decision in its case with Apple. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a district court decision that Uniloc USA, Inc., Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. and Uniloc 2017 all lacked standing to sue Motorola and Blackboard for patent infringement because it was collaterally estopped by a previous decision in its case with Apple. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Holly Brezee
By: Mark Magas  [9/29/22] The law of unintended consequences provides that actions “always have effects that are unanticipated or unintended. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:39 am by Florian Mueller
LLC; Uniloc 2017 LLC; Uniloc USA, Inc.; Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.R.L.; INVT SPE LLC; Inventergy Global, Inc.; and IXI IP, LLC, and (2) dismisses from this action without prejudice its claims against defendant VLSI Technology LLC. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:29 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
The petition was filed by Apple in a patent infringement case filed against it in the Western District of Texas brought by patent assertion entity, Uniloc. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:23 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
ChaseBank USA, N.A., 656 F.3d 877, 883 (9th Cir. 2011); Turnerv. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:43 am by Florian Mueller
Burdick does not work in California [...] ; and that Apple 'attempts to exaggerate Uniloc's ties to California'" (emphasis added)Source: Memorandum Order and Opinion at 16-17, Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Uniloc Patents Ruled Abstract Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Andrei Iancu, No. 17-535 Uniloc USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]