Search for: "Union Insurance Company"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 10:33 am
Ill, Filed Jan. 11, 2012 Insurance companies, self-insured employers, and union health and welfare plans filed the class action in Illinois Federal Court alleging several RICO violations against Walgreen Co. and Par Pharmaceutical Co. for engaging in a scheme to overcharge for generic versions of Zantac and Prozac. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
Illinois Union Insurance Company, in which the same insurer had successfully argued that false loan compliance certifications at issue in a False Claims Act claim did not qualify as professional services and therefore that the claim was excluded from coverage under a professional liability insurance policy. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 9:19 am
In an unpublished opinion Star Insurance Company vs. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:51 pm
National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:15 am
The Texas Supreme Court declared in 1994, in the case, Union Bankers Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
After procuring one million dollar life insurance policies from the defendants Union Central Life Insurance Company, John Hancock, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Perchikov allegedly murdered the decedent to obtain the proceeds of the life insurance policies. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:43 am
Federal Insurance Company, Case No. 09-3096, Abercrombie’s insurer for the 2004-2005 policy period (Federal) refused to pay defense costs related to securities class actions, shareholder derivative suits, and an SEC investigation on the grounds that Abercrombie had improperly “colluded” with its subsequent insurer (National Union) to shift the burden of primary coverage to Federal, thereby prejudicing Federal’s right of… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:43 am
Federal Insurance Company, Case No. 09-3096, Abercrombie’s insurer for the 2004-2005 policy period (Federal) refused to pay defense costs related to securities class actions, shareholder derivative suits, and an SEC investigation on the grounds that Abercrombie had improperly “colluded” with its subsequent insurer (National Union) to shift the burden of primary coverage to Federal, thereby prejudicing Federal’s right of… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:59 am
They are subject to an array of company and league imposed rules. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
They are "faceless" claims by states, insurance companies, and other payers, none of whom suffer serious personal injuries. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:47 am
"... for health insurance and pensions and a union with drastically less negotiating power. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:10 pm
Using the fraudulent proceeds from the insurance companies, Ms. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:24 am
However, in the case of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:05 pm
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Dist. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 5:59 pm
The Certificate of Insurance described the project as "renovation/additions student union building…". [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:20 am
Of course, that is not preventing the health insurance companies from charging higher and higher premiums. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Self-insured employers and health insurers generally must begin paying a new fee imposed as part of PPACA. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 7:42 am
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, the Delaware Superior Court held there was no coverage for a class action brought by the individuals who opted out of a prior class action that had been filed before the subject policies’ inception where both actions involved fundamentally identical allegations of wrongdoing. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Here's the domestic legal news we covered this week: A married same-sex couple filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF] against a former employer on Thursday in the US District Court for the Central District of California [official website] that alleges the company discriminated by refusing to provide spousal health insurance. [read post]
