Search for: "Union Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In an unreported August 1, 2011 ruling in National Credit Union Administration v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
The district court had held that “Union Pacific violated Title VII, as amended by the PDA, because ‘it treats medical care women need to prevent pregnancy less favorably than it treats medical care needed t [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Furthermore, because the law applied equally to all candidates and did not result in unequal treatment, the court held that the statute did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Taylor, 782 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2015); In re Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]